Status of Forces Agreement Cuba

According to documents seen by Reuters, the agreements signed in May 2008 allowed the Cuban armed forces to convert the intelligence unit into a service that spies on its own armed forces, instills fear and paranoia, and suppresses dissent. See e.B Raúl Castro calls on the United States to return the Guantánamo base in Cuba, The Guardian, 28 January 2015, available online at www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/28/raul-castro-return-guantanamo-cuba-us. According to opposition leaders, the crackdown has intimidated the armed forces. Juan Guaido, president of the National Assembly, earlier this year condemned Maduro`s 2018 re-election as a hoax and declared, with the support of most Western democracies, that he was Venezuela`s legitimate leader. The second agreement established a committee known as the Coordination and Liaison Group of the Republic of Cuba (GRUCE). The GRUCE, composed of eight Cuban “military experts,” would send Cuban advisers to Venezuela to inspect military units and train soldiers. Modify, repeal or replace the provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Guantanamo Lease Agreements or alter or relinquish U.S. jurisdiction and control over the U.S. naval base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, unless expressly authorized or otherwise provided by – Under the first agreement, the Cuban Ministry of Defense would oversee a restructuring of the DIM, and advise on the creation of “new units” within the service.

The DIM would also send groups of up to 40 officers to Havana for up to three months of espionage training. Although the U.S. government is the only party that exercises control or jurisdiction over the territory, it is still not U.S. territory, as the treaty states – it is Cuban, only without the legal authority of that country. The U.S. government, for its part, has also argued that there is no habeas corpus at Guantanamo because the constitution does not apply there. (The Supreme Court disagreed with this in 2008, but its decision has since been criticized as largely toothless.) It has used Guantanamo`s strange status to fluctuate conveniently whether or not it counts as part of the United States. The agreements, the details of which are first reported here, led to the introduction of strict surveillance of Venezuelan troops by a Venezuelan intelligence agency now known as the General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM). From the Cuban point of view, the base is a military occupation by a foreign power. And it sort of has a point, except that the land was never taken from Cuba, per se, and the United States claims that the mutual agreement on the lease of the land still exists despite the objections of the communist government. The first agreement, according to the documents, would prepare Venezuelan intelligence agents to “discover and confront the subversive work of the enemy.” The second agreement allowed Cuban officials to oversee the “assimilation” and “modernization” of the Venezuelan military.

In October 2000, Castro went to Caracas to sign a series of economic agreements. Venezuela would give Cuba enough oil to meet half of its energy needs. The crackdown has led to hundreds of arrests. According to the opposition-led National Assembly, at least 200 military officials are currently detained. Citizen Control, a Venezuelan organization that studies the armed forces, says the number is more than 300. The presence of Cuban officials in the Venezuelan military has been known for years. President Nicolas Maduro, a disciple of Chavez and an increasingly besieged successor, said in a 2017 speech: “We are grateful to Cuba`s revolutionary armed forces. We salute them and will always welcome them.

For Chávez, the changes in both agreements resonated on a personal level. Hunger and scarcity have even hit the armed forces. A military doctor recently told Reuters that many registered soldiers are underweight and live mainly on noodles and lentils. But neither country has ever acknowledged the details of the agreements or the extent of Cuban involvement. Eleven years after their falsification, the military deals have proven crucial to Maduro`s survival as president, according to security experts, government insiders and opposition politicians. A status-of-forces agreement (SOFA) is an agreement between a host country and a foreign country that deploys armed forces to that country. SOFAS are often included with other types of military agreements as part of a comprehensive security agreement. A SOFA does not constitute a security agreement; it establishes the rights and privileges of foreign personnel residing in a host country in order to support the broader security arrangement.

[1] In international law, the status of troops differs from that of a military occupation. Military bases on foreign soil are established there as a result of negotiations between the host country and the foreign government. Such an agreement – called the Status of Forces Agreement or SOFA in the case of the United States – essentially states that the laws of the host country do not apply inside the base, but that the host country always retains final ownership of that country. Neither provision deals with the negotiation of a treaty amendment to the Guantánamo Bay lease agreements. If the executive were to negotiate an amendment to the treaty and the Senate gave its advice and consent, the resulting treaty could be interpreted as taking precedence over section 1036 under the “last in time” rule. If such an amendment were made as an executive agreement (i.e., without the participation of the Senate), such a waiver would be less likely unless the agreement is potentially considered an “executive agreement under a previous treaty.” 53 Now, documents detailing Venezuela`s agreements with Cuba — and interviews with dozens of current and former members of the armed forces, government officials, and people familiar with Caracas-Havana relations — show how useful Castro`s help has been. The Castro government, which took control of Cuba in 1959, will not support the deal, but it cannot ignore it completely. The United States regularly sends rent checks for the base in the ordinary amount of $4,085 per year, but Cuba does not buy them back because it would indicate that it considers the treaty, and therefore the American presence, to be legitimate. (The U.S. likes to point out that Cuba cashed a check after the revolution, but Fidel Castro says it was a mistake.) Similarly, Cuba will not sign a SOFA agreement with the United States. The government cannot (or will not) effectively exercise sovereign rights on the base.

In fact, he built one of the largest minefields in the world outside of Guantanamo — in part to prevent Cubans from leaving Cuba to go to Guantanamo. Cuba. “They fear it,” Carrizales said. “He is a clear leader in the armed forces. That`s why they arrested him. A SOFA aims to clarify the conditions under which the foreign military is allowed to operate. As a general rule, purely military operational issues such as the location of bases and access to facilities are covered by separate agreements. A SOFA is more concerned with legal issues associated with military individuals and assets. This may include issues such as entry and exit into the country, tax obligations, postal services or the conditions of employment of nationals of the host country, but the most controversial issues are civil and criminal jurisdiction over bases and personnel. For civil cases, the LAASs provide for the manner in which civil damage caused by the armed forces is determined and paid. Criminal law issues vary, but the typical provision of U.S. SOFA is that U.S.

courts have jurisdiction over crimes committed either by a soldier against another soldier or by a soldier in the course of his or her military service, but the host country retains jurisdiction over other crimes. [4] SOFA agreements usually include a lot of reservations, restrictions, and other fine print about what the foreign nation can and cannot do when domestic laws are enforced, when things remain under the control of the visiting nation, etc. The creation of a base also includes a lease or a lease with its own conditions. You can stay there and do whatever you want with the furniture and so on, but the property still belongs to the host. Defense talks with Cuba have begun. At a meeting in Caracas on May 26, 2008, Rangel and General Alvaro Lopez, Cuba`s Deputy Minister of Defense, signed both agreements. An agreement on visiting forces is similar to a status-of-troop agreement, except that the former only covers forces that are temporarily in a country and are not stationed there. Within months, the countries have worked out two agreements that were recently reviewed by Reuters, giving Cuba deep access to the Venezuelan military — and plenty of leeway to spy on and reshape it. In June, Reuters reported on how a reshuffle of the armed forces and the proliferation of high-ranking officers have engaged Maduro`s military leadership. The political issue of the SOFA is complicated by the fact that many host countries have mixed feelings towards foreign bases on their soil, and requests for renegotiation of sofa are often combined with requests for the complete withdrawal of foreign troops. While the United States and host countries generally agree on what constitutes a crime, many U.S. observers believe that the host country`s judicial systems offer much weaker protection to the accused than the United States, and that the host country`s courts may face public pressure to render a guilty verdict; Moreover, U.S.

soldiers who have been ordered to send abroad should not be forced to give up the rights granted to them under the Bill of Rights. .

No Comments
Previous Post
March 5, 2022
Next Post
March 5, 2022

Comments are closed.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons